A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving potential neighbours over the construction of a wall in a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national focus pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental issues, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier and also the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a extremely publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, find to create their loved ones house. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place advancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of established people. Based on the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being produced by their potential neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their organizing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, particularly within a delicate coastal ecosystem like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, which can be partially designed, is in the proper posture. Their legal team has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where sights of The ocean are both equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the website, Based on sworn evidence referenced during the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-significant drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture which has because become emblematic on the intensity in the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they were meant to Get Visible evidence with the wall’s placement relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location with the sea Irish Moments noted, describing how the two Adult males entered the drinking water for the duration of critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm h2o to photograph the positioning grew to become One of the more striking descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of actions were being cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was being encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up coated in detail via the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as visitors sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to further submissions on whether interim orders should be granted to halt development pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital moment from the lawful timeline.
Within the Main of the dispute is often a disagreement more than boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as constructed, goes beyond what was accepted and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, is described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up paperwork, maps, and situations hooked up into the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their motion is inspired by worry for environmental protection and adherence to planning legislation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A non-public watch, insisting in its place that it is about guaranteeing that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've got explained their extensive-standing relationship to the region as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a pair only seeking to build a relatives house in accordance Together with the legislation. They Rene Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times deny the wall encroaches on the Unique Place of Conservation and say that every one works happen to be carried out dependant on Specialist tips and authorised designs. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the remarkable steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, like moving into the sea through a storm, usually do not alter the underlying facts.
The case has also lifted broader questions about how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute around building of wall at coastal web page is now a shorthand description to get a predicament a large number of observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation in between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier pointed out that the businessman had previously been linked to community advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from pretty distinctive Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-significant water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court need to decide whether the wall as constructed complies with organizing permission and no matter if any encroachment right into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up ailments. Nevertheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who should live together with one another very long following the lawful expenditures are paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development operates at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the situation prolong beyond that tackle. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental safety and residence legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of your dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable go on to look in headlines, linked indelibly to Probably the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.